<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concurrency performance comparison between Erlang and Go</title>
	<atom:link href="http://renzhi.ca/2012/04/04/concurrency-performance-comparison-between-erlang-and-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://renzhi.ca/2012/04/04/concurrency-performance-comparison-between-erlang-and-go/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 12:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: xp</title>
		<link>http://renzhi.ca/2012/04/04/concurrency-performance-comparison-between-erlang-and-go/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>xp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 03:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renzhi.ca/?p=1022#comment-510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t compared the new versions, but that would be something interesting to look at.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t compared the new versions, but that would be something interesting to look at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linicks</title>
		<link>http://renzhi.ca/2012/04/04/concurrency-performance-comparison-between-erlang-and-go/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Linicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renzhi.ca/?p=1022#comment-495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ran these with Go 1.0.2, and Erlang R16B with almost identicle performance on my development box.  It seems as though Erlang is gaining in performance, but Go 1.1 is supposed to be quite a bit faster than Go 1.0.x.  It will be interesting to test Go again when 1.1 is released.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ran these with Go 1.0.2, and Erlang R16B with almost identicle performance on my development box.  It seems as though Erlang is gaining in performance, but Go 1.1 is supposed to be quite a bit faster than Go 1.0.x.  It will be interesting to test Go again when 1.1 is released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://renzhi.ca/2012/04/04/concurrency-performance-comparison-between-erlang-and-go/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 05:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renzhi.ca/?p=1022#comment-334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting, I didn&#039;t think Go could create goroutines that fast. That&#039;s nice to know.

Cheers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I didn&#8217;t think Go could create goroutines that fast. That&#8217;s nice to know.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
